"Atheism" Is Actually A Tool

WE SHALL UNLEASH THE NIHILIST AND ATHEISTS, AND WE SHALL PROVOKE A FORMIDABLE SOCIAL CATACLYSM WHICH IN ALL ITS HORROR WILL SHOW CLEARLY TO THE NATIONS THE EFFECT OF ABSOLUTE ATHEISM, ORIGIN OF SAVAGRY AND OF THE MOST BLOODY TURMOIL. THEN EVERYWHERE, THE CITIZENS, OBLIGED TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST THE MINORITY OF REVOLOTIONARIES, WILL EXTERMINATE THOSE DESTROYERS OF CIVILIZATION, AND THE MULTITUDE DISILLUSIONED WITH CHRISTIANITY, WHOSE DEISTIC SPIRITS WILL FROM THAT MOMENT BE WITHOUT COMPASS (DIRECTION), ANXIOUS FOR AN IDEAL, BUT WITHOUT KNOWING WHERE TO RENDER ITS ADORATION, WILL RECEIVE THE PURE LIGHT THROUGH THE UNIVERSAL MANIFESTATION OF THE PURE DOCTRINE OF LUCIFER, BROUGHT FINALLY OUT IN THE PUBLIC VIEW, A MANIFESTATION WHICH WILL RESULT FROM THE GENERAL REACTIONARY MOVEMENT WHICH WILL FOLLOW THE DESTRUCTION OF CHAISTIANITY AND ATHEISM. BOTH CONQUERED AND EXTERMINATED AT THE SAME TIME." Quoted in Fourth Reich of the Rich, Griffin, pp. 71, 72.

Regarding Bible Manuscripts Purported to be the "Oldest and Best"

“It is to be regretted that this matter was never cleared up at the time the claim was made.  It cannot be said to have been settled by the mere opinions of Tregelles or Bradshaw, or by the more critical and palaeographical objections urged by Mr. Scrivener…. On the side of Simonides is his unlimited skill in calligraphy; the very audacity of such a claim if entirely baseless; the remarkable presence in the Codex of a portion of the Shepherd of Hermas, which Simonides was the first scholar ever to have seen in Greek; the very natural allusions to the work in the lithographed letters (sent by a friend of Simonides years before the controversy); the fact that no visitor to the monastery at Mount Sinai before 1844 had ever seen or heard of such a work as belonging to the monks; and the very extraordinary story told by Tischendorf of his discovery and acquisition of the Codex.  The question therefore, pending the acquisition of further evidence, must remain among the interesting but unsolved mysteries of literature.”  (Literary Forgeries, by James A. Farrer, 1907, pp. 64-65, emphasis added)

Notice that Farrer refers to the issue as one of the “unsolved mysteries of literature” nearly fifty years after these events happened.   This is something they don’t teach at Bible colleges, but that is the whole purpose of the work we do.  Our desire is to alert the Church to important issues, not for the purpose of stirring up controversy, but for edification, so that the faith of the Gospel might be better defended.  It is important to remember that the Codex Sinaiticus is used by higher critics to undermine and discredit the Bible.  Not just the King James Bible, but any Bible.  As such, we believe that having a true and accurate history of the codex is very important for the Church.

To learn more about the men mentioned above (Tregelles, Bradshaw, Scrivener), we recommend viewing the film, "Tares Among the Wheat" where the role of these historic figures is explained.  

Also, to understand what we mean about how Sinaiticus is used to discredit the Bible, we recommend viewing this seven minute clip from the BBC documentary, The Beauty of Books: Ancient Bibles, the Codex Sinaiticus.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCkyakphoKE

From The Vatican Website

Catechism of the Catholic Church

"460 The Word became flesh to make us "partakers of the divine nature":⁷⁸ "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."⁷⁹ "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."⁸⁰ "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."^81"

This is what the Bible has to say about this Catechism: "I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images."  Isaiah 42:8

From The Designers Of Our "Education" System

Lord Bertrand Russell, who joined with the Frankfurt School in this effort at mass social engineering, spilled the beans, in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote:

"Physiology and psychology afford fields for scientific technique which still await development. Two great men, Pavlov and Freud, have laid the foundation. I do not accept the view that they are in any essential conflict, but what structure will be built on their foundations is still in doubt. I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology.... Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called "education." Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part.... It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.''

Russell continued, ``The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship....The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. ...(more)